Danh ngôn của Bruce Sterling
I do have two data identities. I have my name, Bruce Sterling, which is my public name under which I write novels. I also have my other name, which is my legal name under which I own property and vote.
I do have two data identities. I have my name, Bruce Sterling, which is my public name under which I write novels. I also have my other name, which is my legal name under which I own property and vote.
Tôi có hai danh tính dữ liệu. Tôi có tên là Bruce Sterling, tên công khai của tôi khi tôi viết tiểu thuyết. Tôi cũng có tên khác của mình, đó là tên hợp pháp của tôi, tôi sở hữu tài sản và bỏ phiếu.
Tác giả: Bruce Sterling | Chuyên mục: Legal | Sứ mệnh: [9]
Tìm kiếm kiến thức và thông tin về Bruce Sterling từ chuyên trang Kabala Tra Cứu. Nếu bạn không tìm được thông tin phù hợp, hãy liên hệ: [email protected]
Các câu danh ngôn khác của cùng tác giả: Bruce Sterling
- I used to think that cyberspace was fifty years away. What I thought was fifty years away, was only ten years away. And what I thought was ten years away... it was already here. I just wasn't aware of it yet.
- My idea of an amusement park story is getting adventurers to go tour environmental disaster areas. After all, if the entire Great Barrier Reef gets killed, which seems like an extremely lively possibility, what are you going to do with all that rotting limestone?
Các câu danh ngôn khác của cùng chuyên mục: Legal
- Lawyers are the first refuge of the incompetent.
- With the death of bin Laden, it's finally time for Congress to bring back the pre-9-11 legal norm, before we decided it was okay to toss out our civil liberties if the 'bad guys' were scary enough.
- I didn't grow up believing that abortion was a good choice for women, but since it was legal, I thought it must be okay.
- The legal right of the Southern people to reclaim their fugitives I have constantly admitted. The legal right of Congress to interfere with their institution in the states, I have constantly denied.
- Mississippi's loose campaign finance laws allow lawyers and companies to contribute heavily to the judges they appear before. That is terrible for justice, since the courts are teeming with perfectly legal conflicts of interest.