Danh ngôn của Charles T. Canady

The Supreme Court has in place a legal structure which protects abortion rights in this country, and something has got to be done to change that before we can put in place truly meaningful protection for the unborn.

- Charles T. Canady

Dịch Đổi ảnh nền Đổi Font chữ + - Tải Ảnh

The Supreme Court has in place a legal structure which protects abortion rights in this country, and something has got to be done to change that before we can put in place truly meaningful protection for the unborn.

Tòa án Tối cao đã thiết lập một cơ cấu pháp lý để bảo vệ quyền phá thai ở đất nước này, và phải làm gì đó để thay đổi điều đó trước khi chúng ta có thể đưa ra sự bảo vệ thực sự có ý nghĩa cho thai nhi.

Tác giả: Charles T. Canady | Chuyên mục: Legal | Sứ mệnh: [8]

Tìm kiếm kiến thức và thông tin về Charles T. Canady từ chuyên trang Kabala Tra Cứu. Nếu bạn không tìm được thông tin phù hợp, hãy liên hệ: [email protected]

Các câu danh ngôn khác của cùng tác giả: Charles T. Canady

• Families are not merely constructs of outdated convention, and traditional marriage laws were not based on animosity toward homosexuals. Rather, I believe that the traditional family structure - centered on a lawful union between one man and one woman - comports with nature and with our Judeo-Christian moral tradition.

Các câu danh ngôn khác của cùng chuyên mục: Legal

• Lawyers are the first refuge of the incompetent.
• With the death of bin Laden, it's finally time for Congress to bring back the pre-9-11 legal norm, before we decided it was okay to toss out our civil liberties if the 'bad guys' were scary enough.
• I didn't grow up believing that abortion was a good choice for women, but since it was legal, I thought it must be okay.
• The legal right of the Southern people to reclaim their fugitives I have constantly admitted. The legal right of Congress to interfere with their institution in the states, I have constantly denied.
• Mississippi's loose campaign finance laws allow lawyers and companies to contribute heavily to the judges they appear before. That is terrible for justice, since the courts are teeming with perfectly legal conflicts of interest.