Danh ngôn của David E. Sanger
In the Chinese view, the United States has designed its own system of rules about what constitutes 'legal' spying and what is illegal.
In the Chinese view, the United States has designed its own system of rules about what constitutes 'legal' spying and what is illegal.
Theo quan điểm của Trung Quốc, Hoa Kỳ đã thiết kế hệ thống quy tắc riêng của mình về điều gì cấu thành hoạt động gián điệp 'hợp pháp' và điều gì là bất hợp pháp.
Tác giả: David E. Sanger | Chuyên mục: Legal | Sứ mệnh: [1]
Tìm kiếm kiến thức và thông tin về David E. Sanger từ chuyên trang Kabala Tra Cứu. Nếu bạn không tìm được thông tin phù hợp, hãy liên hệ: [email protected]
Các câu danh ngôn khác của cùng tác giả: David E. Sanger
- We had a great chance in the mid-2000s to reach an accord with the Chinese on both energy and environmental issues. That deal would have essentially been that the U.S. could provide the equipment and expertise, and the Chinese would help close the trade gap. It was a huge opportunity that we failed to exploit.
- We have spent so much time worrying about a 'cyber Pearl Harbor,'' the attack that takes out the power grid, that we have focused far too little on the subtle manipulation of data that can mean that no election, medical record, or self-driving car can be truly trusted.
Các câu danh ngôn khác của cùng chuyên mục: Legal
- Lawyers are the first refuge of the incompetent.
- With the death of bin Laden, it's finally time for Congress to bring back the pre-9-11 legal norm, before we decided it was okay to toss out our civil liberties if the 'bad guys' were scary enough.
- I didn't grow up believing that abortion was a good choice for women, but since it was legal, I thought it must be okay.
- The legal right of the Southern people to reclaim their fugitives I have constantly admitted. The legal right of Congress to interfere with their institution in the states, I have constantly denied.
- Mississippi's loose campaign finance laws allow lawyers and companies to contribute heavily to the judges they appear before. That is terrible for justice, since the courts are teeming with perfectly legal conflicts of interest.