Danh ngôn của Heather Brooke
Britain's legal structure is basically the same as in feudal times: laws are written for the elite.
Britain's legal structure is basically the same as in feudal times: laws are written for the elite.
Cơ cấu pháp lý của Anh về cơ bản giống như thời phong kiến: luật được viết ra cho giới thượng lưu.
Tác giả: Heather Brooke | Chuyên mục: Legal | Sứ mệnh: [5]
Tìm kiếm kiến thức và thông tin về Heather Brooke từ chuyên trang Kabala Tra Cứu. Nếu bạn không tìm được thông tin phù hợp, hãy liên hệ: [email protected]
Các câu danh ngôn khác của cùng tác giả: Heather Brooke
- When you're a crime reporter, you see the nub of what life's about, and you don't have much patience for the falsity of politics.
- There is a very intense culture of secrecy in Britain that hasn't yet been dismantled. What passes for transparency here would serve any secret society well.
- I pine for a return to the type of old-school journalism and the tough newspapermen and women of the Thirties.
- In America, you have the Cyber Intelligence Sharing and Protection Act. You've got drones now being considered for domestic surveillance. You have the National Security Agency building the world's giantest spy center.
- I trained as a journalist in America where paying sources is frowned upon. Now I work in the U.K. where there is a more flexible attitude.
Các câu danh ngôn khác của cùng chuyên mục: Legal
- Lawyers are the first refuge of the incompetent.
- With the death of bin Laden, it's finally time for Congress to bring back the pre-9-11 legal norm, before we decided it was okay to toss out our civil liberties if the 'bad guys' were scary enough.
- I didn't grow up believing that abortion was a good choice for women, but since it was legal, I thought it must be okay.
- The legal right of the Southern people to reclaim their fugitives I have constantly admitted. The legal right of Congress to interfere with their institution in the states, I have constantly denied.
- Mississippi's loose campaign finance laws allow lawyers and companies to contribute heavily to the judges they appear before. That is terrible for justice, since the courts are teeming with perfectly legal conflicts of interest.