Danh ngôn của Barton Gellman

The NSA has different reporting requirements for each branch of government and each of its legal authorities.
The NSA has different reporting requirements for each branch of government and each of its legal authorities.
NSA có các yêu cầu báo cáo khác nhau đối với từng nhánh của chính phủ và từng cơ quan pháp lý của nó.
Tác giả: Barton Gellman | Chuyên mục: Legal | Sứ mệnh: [8]
Tìm kiếm kiến thức và thông tin về Barton Gellman từ chuyên trang Kabala Tra Cứu. Nếu bạn không tìm được thông tin phù hợp, hãy liên hệ: [email protected]
Các câu danh ngôn khác của cùng tác giả: Barton Gellman
- The National Security Agency has broken privacy rules or overstepped its legal authority thousands of times each year since Congress granted the agency broad new powers in 2008, according to an internal audit and other top-secret documents.
- Daniel Ellsberg showed tremendous courage back in the '70s.
- At Cheney's initiative, the United States stripped terror suspects of long-established rights under domestic and international law, building a new legal edifice under exclusive White House ownership.
- You don't need to be a spook to care about encryption. If you travel with your computer or keep it in a place where other people can put their hands on it, you're vulnerable.
- Most computers today have built in backup software.
Các câu danh ngôn khác của cùng chuyên mục: Legal
- Lawyers are the first refuge of the incompetent.
- With the death of bin Laden, it's finally time for Congress to bring back the pre-9-11 legal norm, before we decided it was okay to toss out our civil liberties if the 'bad guys' were scary enough.
- I didn't grow up believing that abortion was a good choice for women, but since it was legal, I thought it must be okay.
- The legal right of the Southern people to reclaim their fugitives I have constantly admitted. The legal right of Congress to interfere with their institution in the states, I have constantly denied.
- Mississippi's loose campaign finance laws allow lawyers and companies to contribute heavily to the judges they appear before. That is terrible for justice, since the courts are teeming with perfectly legal conflicts of interest.