Danh ngôn của Francis Parker Yockey
The independence of the economic sphere was a tenet of faith with Liberalism.
The independence of the economic sphere was a tenet of faith with Liberalism.
Sự độc lập của lĩnh vực kinh tế là một nguyên lý của niềm tin vào Chủ nghĩa Tự do.
Tác giả: Francis Parker Yockey | Chuyên mục: Independence | Sứ mệnh: [7]
Tìm kiếm kiến thức và thông tin về Francis Parker Yockey từ chuyên trang Kabala Tra Cứu. Nếu bạn không tìm được thông tin phù hợp, hãy liên hệ: [email protected]
Các câu danh ngôn khác của cùng tác giả: Francis Parker Yockey
- Liberalism is Rationalism in politics.
- Politics is activity in relation to power.
- Every non-political human grouping of whatever kind, legal, social, religious, economic or other becomes at last political if it creates an opposition deep enough to range men against one another as enemies.
- Pessimism only describes an attitude, and not facts, and hence is entirely subjective.
- Every science is a profane restatement of the preceding dogmas of the religious period.
Các câu danh ngôn khác của cùng chuyên mục: Independence
- I'm one of seven kids, and I love being around a bunch of siblings because I think it teaches you independence, and it teaches you how to grow up quickly and also just be a good friend and be a good sister.
- Independence day is an interesting time to reflect on our strange fealty to institutions that the British left us, including those that were explicitly set up to be used against us.
- I pledged to put country before party and assert my independence when it reflects my principles or the needs of Central Virginia, and I have done that.
- Our Declaration of Independence was held sacred by all and thought to include all; but now, to aid in making the bondage of the Negro universal and eternal, it is assailed, sneered at, construed, hawked at, and torn, till, if its framers could rise from their graves, they could not at all recognize it.
- I should like to know if, taking this old Declaration of Independence, which declares that all men are equal upon principle, you begin making exceptions to it, where will you stop? If one man says it does not mean a Negro, why not another say it does not mean some other man?