Danh ngôn của Sarah Jeong

The belief that the law will never 'catch up' to technology is borne in part of tech exceptionalism, a libertarian elitism that derides any kind of legal or regulatory impediment as Luddism.

- Sarah Jeong

Dịch Đổi ảnh nền Đổi Font chữ + - Tải Ảnh

The belief that the law will never 'catch up' to technology is borne in part of tech exceptionalism, a libertarian elitism that derides any kind of legal or regulatory impediment as Luddism.

Niềm tin rằng luật pháp sẽ không bao giờ 'bắt kịp' công nghệ xuất phát từ một phần của chủ nghĩa ngoại lệ về công nghệ, một chủ nghĩa tinh hoa theo chủ nghĩa tự do coi thường bất kỳ loại trở ngại pháp lý hoặc quy định nào là Chủ nghĩa Luddism.

Tác giả: Sarah Jeong | Chuyên mục: Legal | Sứ mệnh: [8]

Tìm kiếm kiến thức và thông tin về Sarah Jeong từ chuyên trang Kabala Tra Cứu. Nếu bạn không tìm được thông tin phù hợp, hãy liên hệ: [email protected]

Các câu danh ngôn khác của cùng tác giả: Sarah Jeong

• Facebook lets me be lazy the way a man in a stereotypical 1950s office can be lazy. Facebook is the digital equivalent of my secretary, or perhaps my wife, yelling at me not to forget to wish someone a happy birthday or to inform me I have a social engagement this evening.

Các câu danh ngôn khác của cùng chuyên mục: Legal

• Lawyers are the first refuge of the incompetent.
• With the death of bin Laden, it's finally time for Congress to bring back the pre-9-11 legal norm, before we decided it was okay to toss out our civil liberties if the 'bad guys' were scary enough.
• I didn't grow up believing that abortion was a good choice for women, but since it was legal, I thought it must be okay.
• The legal right of the Southern people to reclaim their fugitives I have constantly admitted. The legal right of Congress to interfere with their institution in the states, I have constantly denied.
• Mississippi's loose campaign finance laws allow lawyers and companies to contribute heavily to the judges they appear before. That is terrible for justice, since the courts are teeming with perfectly legal conflicts of interest.